Have a Hand?? Submit it to: webmaster@acblemba.org
From Seattle NABC
Submitted By Bob Bertoni from Hand record 85724
It seems to me that the hands I get are significantly more difficult than
those that play the same hands in my direction. Here I am Dealer East.
Seattle Friday AX
|
East Deals None Vul |
♠ Q 6 3 ♥ Q 8 4 2 ♦ K Q 6 2 ♣ K 9 |
||||||||||
|
♠ —
♥ K 10 9 7 ♦ A 9 5 4 ♣ A Q 8 7 2 |
|
♠ A K J 10 9 8 7 5 4 2
♥ — ♦ 8 7 3 ♣ — |
|||||||||
|
♠ — ♥ A J 6 5 3 ♦ J 10 ♣ J 10 6 5 4 3 |
|||||||||||
In Seattle I picked up this Spade monster as dealer. I pondered for a few extra seconds. What to open this hand? We do not play Namyats, 4S just seemed wrong. 1S appeared to leave a lot of preempts to get in the way of what I wanted to know from partner, and the true strength of my hand lies in an outstanding trump suit and 2 voids. What do I need for 6S? Not a lot, 2 winners and any split in trumps. So I opened 2Cgame forcing strong and we play controls so I decided that was the best I could do. After all with luck the spade 6 might be an entry opposite 63 and stiff Q.
So what happened at other tables?? 6S == everywhere or 4S making 6 galore. So I had to ask people how they make it... I love the punishment. Some said that they got the Ace Hearts lead, how welcome was that? Others got the club lead and then decided to play on club after taking Ace ruffing the K and making it eaasily. Interesting ducking at trick doesnt work either so the correct line never came to my vision, I asked several experts and most of them got it after a few seconds to play AC and a club, as I said other people get the easy hands.
In Open BAM in Seattle, I was in 4S afterovercalling 4S over RHO's gambling 3N.
9-5-11 Bridgespot
|
Board 23 South Deals Both Vul |
♠ A Q 8 4 ♥ A K 10 8 2 ♦ 7 ♣ 10 6 3 |
||||||||||
|
♠ J 7 2
♥ J 7 ♦ Q J 9 5 4 2 ♣ Q 5 |
|
♠ K 9 5
♥ 6 ♦ A K 10 8 ♣ A K 9 8 2 |
|||||||||
|
♠ 10 6 3 ♥ Q 9 5 4 3 ♦ 6 3 ♣ J 7 4 |
|||||||||||
EW 5♦; EW 5♣; NS 2♥; EW 1N
| West | North | East | South |
| Pass | |||
| Pass | 2 ♦ | Pass | Pass |
| Pass |
| 2 ♦ by North |
When making agreements, we try to come up with a system to improve our score.Sometimes it works and sometimes we forget.
Take this deal submitted by Tom Macbeth from the Bridgespot. North opened 2♦ as Flannery (11-15 HCP with 5♥ and 4♠) it went pass by east who has no bid against 2♦, then Pass by south who forgot their agreement and believed it a weak two bid. So it came to west who has a bad hand in all auctions except ♦ so he passed.
The play: East led the K♦followed by a low ♦ to partners Q declarer showing out!! A shift to the Q♣ followed by the 5♣ produced 5♣. a ♥ ruff, ♠K and all ♦ for 12 tricks on defense.
2♦-7 for +700 EW beating their par score of 600 in a minor game.
Have you seen 700 before ?
